Finally! Nutrition Labels Are Getting a Makeover

February 27, 2014 | By | Comments (1)

Finally! Nutrition label changes could make it clearer to Americans what they’re actually eating. This morning, first lady Michelle Obama introduced an FDA-backed plan to significantly revise food labels.

Insert applause here, then begin holding breath.

proposed-nutrition-label

Food and Drug Administration

• The most prominent text on the label would tell you how many servings are actually in a box or bag. No longer would a small bag of chips note in small type that it contains “2.5 servings.” That bag would be one serving, and the total nutrition, including calories, would be more easily seen.

• In a related move, serving sizes would become more realistic for some foods, reflecting what people actually eat today.  A serving of ice cream, right now reckoned to be ½ cup, becomes 1 cup, because that’s what the FDA reckons that most Americans eat.

•  Added sugars would now be clearly listed. This would differentiate between sugars found naturally in foods (such as milk and fruit) and those added by manufacturers. The juice and pulp of one whole mango has 30g of sugar; so does ¼ cup of Skittles candy.  The new label would help make clear which one has the added sugar.

• Potassium and vitamin D would make an appearance. These are two key nutrients that some Americans aren’t getting enough of. Vitamin D is important for its role in bone health. Potassium is beneficial in lowering blood pressure, potentially counteracting the effects of a high-sodium diet.

The “calories from fat” number would be cut from the label. What you would see—more important to health—is the breakdown of the types of fat: saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated. Generally, Americans need to cut sat fat in favor of other “healthy” fats, and this change should help them do that.

“Our guiding principle here is very simple,” said the first lady. “That you as a parent and a consumer should be able to walk into your local grocery store, pick up an item off the shelf, and be able to tell whether it’s good for your family. So this is a big deal, and it’s going to make a big difference for families all across this country.”

The changes will take time, if they happen. The FDA has opened a 90-day comment period, during which experts, members of the public, and the food industry can weigh in on the proposed rules. The agency will then review the feedback and issue a final rule, a step that could take more than a year.  Once a final rule is issued, companies have two years to implement the changes, which the FDA says could cost $2 billion to implement (but it predicts many more billions in health benefits).

Our take at Cooking Light is that the food industry may kick up a bit of a fuss, either arguing that the costs are excessive or the benefits imagined, but it’s hard to imagine consumers being agitated the way some were over the New York “soda law.” These label changes don’t propose to restrict consumer choice. They are about transparency in the midst of a widely understood obesity crisis. Whether the new labels might cause confusion is another question (“Look, now I can eat a cup of ice cream when I thought I could only eat half a cup!”).

Meanwhile, research shows that more of us are paying attention to labels. A recent USDA study indicates that 42% of adults between the ages of 29 and 68 are reading labels while shopping, up from 34% in 2007.

COMMENTS

  1. Jean Evans

    I have had a heart attack in July. I have heart disease. I’m 5′ 2″ and weigh 110. There is heart disease in my family. An Uncle died at 62, another at 70. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT I KNOW THE AMOUNT OF CALORIES WHICH ARE FAT CALORIES. That percentage helps to keep my fat calories at 25% of my total daily intake. Just knowing the grams is not enough. You sometimes have 230 cal and below it might show 5 g saturated and 0 unsaturated. But directly across from the total you would see for ie: 230 cal 95 fat cal., the way our current nutrition info is listed. Now you can see that the fat is actually 40%.

    February 27, 2014 at 9:23 pm

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s